Skip to main content

Home › Tools

UK Journalist Tools & Calculators

51 free, client-side tools for UK journalists across FOI workflow, editorial and legal checks, freelance business, and source safety. No signup, no AI cost, no data sent anywhere.

Last reviewed: Next review due:

FOI Workflow

5 tools

Calculate FOI deadlines, draft requests for any UK authority type, appeal refusals using the right exemption, escalate to the ICO, and pick between FOIA and the Environmental Information Regulations.

FOI Deadline Calculator

Calculate your 20-working-day deadline under section 10 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Enter the date you sent the request and this tool returns the statutory deadline, a 15-day reminder, and a chase date — plus a ready-to-send follow-up email.

The clock starts the day after the authority receives your request (or the day you send it if sent electronically and received during business hours).

Statutory Deadline (20 working days)

Friday, 11 September 2026


15-day reminder (5 days before deadline)

Friday, 4 September 2026

Chase the authority if you haven't heard anything.

21st working-day chase (1 day after deadline)

Monday, 14 September 2026

Deadline has passed — send follow-up email below.

Bank holidays: This calculator skips weekends only. Bank holidays may extend the deadline by 1 day each — verify against gov.uk/bank-holidays if your request crosses Easter, Christmas, or other public holidays.

FOI Request Builder

Generate a formal Freedom of Information Act 2000 request letter, tailored to the type of public authority. Fill in the details and copy or print the ready-to-send letter.

Tip: WhatDoTheyKnow.com publishes requests and responses — great for researching how similar requests were handled and following up on published data.


FOI Appeal Builder

Generate an internal review request after a Freedom of Information refusal. An internal review is required before you can complain to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO). Fill in the details and copy or print the letter.

Authority claims the request would cost over £600 (central government) or £450 (other public bodies) to process. Check if the request can be narrowed to bring it within the cost limit.

Next step:If the internal review upholds the refusal, you have the right to complain to the Information Commissioner's Office under section 50 of FOIA. Use the ICO Complaint Builder tool to draft your complaint.

ICO Complaint Builder

Generate a formal complaint to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) after an internal review fails to resolve your FOI dispute. You must complete an internal review before the ICO will investigate. Fill in the details, tick the documents you are enclosing, then copy or print.

Evidence checklist — tick documents you have ready to enclose

Online submission: You can submit this complaint directly at ico.org.uk/make-a-complaint — the ICO typically issues a Decision Notice within 6–12 months. The ICO has the power to order disclosure and can name the authority publicly in its Decision Notice.

Recent ICO decision notices (FOIA)

as of 2026-08-13

How the Information Commissioner has recently ruled on Freedom of Information Act complaints — the public authority, the FOIA section(s) engaged, and whether the complaint was upheld. A useful gauge of what the ICO expects and where authorities most often fall short (section 10, the 20‑working‑day deadline, recurs often).

  • Chief Constable Kent PoliceFOI 30(1): Not upheld

    The complainant made two requests for information relating to a police investigation concerning a fatal fire at a specified address. The Commissioner’s decision is that Kent Police was entitled to rely on section 30(1)(a) of FOIA to withhold the requested information.

    Police and criminal justice · 7 August 2026 · IC-402582-N0Z9
  • A public authority will breach section 10 of FOIA if it fails to respond to a request within 20 working days. Based on evidence available to the Commissioner, by the date of this notice the public authority has not issued a substantive response to this request.

    Central government · 7 August 2026 · IC-533364-V7C0
  • The National ArchivesFOI 10: Upheld, FOI 41: Not upheld

    The complainant has requested a copy of their late father’s service records. The National Archives (TNA) disclosed some of the records but relied on section 41 of FOIA (information provided in confidence) to redact medical information.

    Central government · 7 August 2026 · IC-426830-T2W9
  • Kent County CouncilFOI 10: Upheld

    The complainant requested information from Kent County Council about Supported Living Schemes. The Commissioner’s decision is that the public authority failed to respond to the request within 20 working days and has therefore breached section 10 of FOIA.

    Local government · 7 August 2026 · IC-533696-N5Q4
  • The complainant requested information from London Borough of Southwark relating to traffic conventions. The Commissioner’s decision is that the public authority failed to respond to the request within 20 working days and has therefore breached section 10 of FOIA.

    Local government · 7 August 2026 · IC-530563-J7T6
  • Westminster City CouncilFOI 1: Upheld, FOI 40(2): Not upheld, FOI 41: Not upheld

    The complainant requested information about a named individual, including correspondence, notes, recordings and CCTV footage. Westminster City Council withheld some information under sections 40(2) and 41 of FOIA and said that some information was not held.

    Local government · 7 August 2026 · IC-474818-C4H6
  •  The complainant requested information from the University of Manchester relating to membership of an All-Party Parliamentary Group for Energy Studies. The Commissioner’s decision is that the public authority failed to respond to the request within 20 working days and has therefore breached sec

    Education · 7 August 2026 · IC-533872-V8D3
  • Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory AgencyFOI 1: Not upheld, FOI 40: Not upheld

    The complainant requested information relating to the use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) stimulators. The MHRA confirmed information was held but determined it could not be provided as it was personal data under section 40(1) and 40(2) FOIA.

    Health, Regulators · 6 August 2026 · IC-412648-Y4J6
  • The complainant requested information from South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority relating to the South Yorkshire People’s Network. The Commissioner’s decision is that the public authority failed to respond to the request within 20 working days and has therefore breached section 10 of FOIA.

    South Yorkshire Combined Mayoral Authority · 6 August 2026 · IC-530523-B4Y3
  • Ministry of Justice (MoJ)FOI 40: Not upheld

    The complainant has requested information about the number of youths on remand. The Ministry of Justice (“MoJ”) relied on section 40(2) (personal information) of FOIA to withhold some of the requested information.

    Central government · 6 August 2026 · IC-440533-J5M2
  • Maritime and Coastguard AgencyFOI 31(1)(a): Not upheld

    The Commissioner does not require further steps, as a result of this decision notice. Back to top Print this page For the public Official information Nuisance calls For organisations UK GDPR guidance and resources Freedom of information EIR and access to information Direct marketing Advice and servi

    Central government · 5 August 2026 · IC-418546-S2Z6
  • The complainant has requested information about offences mentioning “Grok” from the Metropolitan Police Service (the “MPS”). The MPS initially advised that the request was vexatious on the grounds of burden, citing section 14(1) (Vexatious requests) of FOIA.

    Police and criminal justice · 5 August 2026 · IC-476050-B3T1

Source: ICO decision notices · retrieved 2026-08-13· a rolling sample of FOIA notices; read each in full for the Commissioner’s reasoning.


EIR vs FOI Selector

Should you make your request under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR) or the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA)?

The EIR applies whenever information is ‘environmental’ in nature — and crucially, it covers private companies carrying out public functions related to the environment (e.g. water companies, energy utilities), which FOIA does not. Answer the questions below to find out which regime applies to your request.

Question 1 of 60%

Does the information relate to the state of the environment (air, water, soil, biodiversity, landscape, or protected sites)?

Find your patch

Enter any UK postcode to find the public bodies that cover it — the starting point for local reporting and FOI.

Editorial & Legal

15 tools

Pre-publication legal checks (defamation, contempt, reporting restrictions), public-interest documentation, right-of-reply emails, correction generators, AI disclosure recommendations, headline checker, word counter and byline generator. None of these are legal advice — see disclaimer.

Defamation Risk Checklist

Answer all 10 questions to assess your defamation risk under the Defamation Act 2013.

Information only — not legal advice. This tool provides editorial guidance. For serious-harm allegations always consult a qualified media lawyer. See full disclaimer.

Q1Identification

Is anyone identifiable from the publication (named OR identifiable by context, role, photo)?

Q2Defamatory meaning

Could a reasonable reader think less of them as a result?

Q3Serious harm

Is the harm to their reputation likely to be serious (or for companies: serious financial loss)?

Q4Truth (substantial truth)

Can you prove the substance of what you say is true with documentary or testimonial evidence?

Q5Honest opinion

If it's opinion, is it clearly opinion (not stated as fact), based on facts stated/referenced, and one a reasonable person could hold?

Q6Public interest defence (s.4)

Is publication in the public interest AND did you reasonably believe so at time of publication?

Q7Privilege

Does absolute or qualified privilege apply (court report, parliamentary, regulatory bodies)?

Q8Right of reply

Have you put allegations to the subject in advance with a reasonable deadline?

Q9Evidence file

Do you have a documented evidence file (notes, recordings, documents) you could produce in court?

Q10Legal read

Has a qualified media lawyer reviewed (recommended for serious-harm allegations)?


Defamation Risk Score

Answer these questions about your story to get an indicative defamation risk score, referencing the Defamation Act 2013.

Not legal advice. This tool gives an illustrative indicator only, based on general principles of English and Welsh defamation law. Always seek qualified legal advice for any story carrying real defamation risk.

Answer all questions above to see your risk indicator.


Contempt of Court Checker

Answer all 10 questions to assess your contempt risk under the Contempt of Court Act 1981.

Information only — not legal advice. Contempt of court carries criminal liability. Always consult a qualified media lawyer when proceedings are active. See full disclaimer.

1.Has anyone been arrested without charge in connection with the story?

2.Has anyone been charged with an offence in this story?

3.Has a warrant been issued for someone in this story?

4.Has a summons been issued?

5.Is the matter set for jury trial?

6.Are you reporting previous convictions of an accused before trial?

7.Are you reporting confessions, alleged confessions, or "off-the-record" admissions?

8.Are you running identification photographs of an accused where ID is in issue?

9.Is there a Section 4(2) postponement order, Section 11 anonymity order or reporting restriction?

10.Are you commenting on the credibility of witnesses or the strength of the case?


Contempt Timeline Tracker

Track active-proceedings status for cases you are covering, and get a strict-liability window warning under the Contempt of Court Act 1981 s.2. Saved locally in your browser only.

Not legal advice. This is an illustrative reminder tool only. Contempt risk depends on the specific content published, not just dates. Always seek legal advice for reporting on active criminal proceedings.

No cases tracked yet. Add a case above to see its active-proceedings status.

Suggested publication holds while active: avoid assertions of guilt or innocence, previous convictions, disputed confessions, identification evidence, and character/credibility commentary on witnesses or the accused. Factual, contemporaneous, fair reporting of what happens in open court is normally protected (s.4 CCA 1981), but commentary beyond that carries risk.

Reporting Restrictions Checklist

Answer yes or no to identify applicable UK court reporting restrictions before publication.

Information only — not legal advice. Always check the court list on the day and obtain the exact wording of any order. Breaching a restriction order is contempt of court. See full disclaimer.

1.Are any participants under 18 (youth court — automatic s.49 anonymity)?

Children and Young Persons Act 1933, s.49

2.Is the case in adult court but you want to identify a juvenile victim/witness? (s.45 YJCEA discretionary order)

Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, s.45

3.Is it a sexual offence — alleged victim has lifetime anonymity (s.1 SOA 1992)?

Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992, s.1

4.Is the case in the Family Court? (s.97 Children Act 1989)

Children Act 1989, s.97; Family Procedure Rules 2010, r.27.11

5.Has the judge made a Section 4(2) postponement order (delay publication of certain matter until trial ends)?

Contempt of Court Act 1981, s.4(2)

6.Has the judge made a Section 11 anonymity order (e.g. blackmail victims, national security)?

Contempt of Court Act 1981, s.11

7.Are special measures in place for vulnerable witnesses (screens, video link)?

Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, ss.23–30

8.Is there a derogatory mitigation order (s.58 CJA 1996)?

Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, s.58

9.Is the trial subject to a reporting restriction the court has made privately (check court list)?

Various — check court listing

10.Are you in a youth court where adult co-accused are tried — section 49 may still apply to youth?

Children and Young Persons Act 1933, s.49 (as extended)


Reporting Restriction Checker

Select the court, case type and stage of proceedings to see which UK reporting restrictions are likely to apply, with the relevant statute.

Not legal advice. This tool flags commonly applicable restrictions only. Individual court orders (postponement, anonymity, reporting-restriction orders under s.4(2) or s.11 CCA 1981) can add or lift restrictions in a specific case — always check for a live order before publishing.

Select all three options above to see applicable reporting restrictions.


Court Active-Proceedings Calculator

Work out when criminal proceedings became “active” for strict-liability contempt purposes under the Contempt of Court Act 1981, and when that active period is likely to end.

Not legal advice. Active status ends on a qualifying event (verdict, sentence, discontinuance), not on a calendar date. The estimated range below is illustrative only, based on typical case timelines — always check the actual case status before relying on it.

Complete the fields above to calculate the active-proceedings window.


Can I Name Them? Decision Engine

Enter details of the person you want to name, the court context, and any orders — get the applicable UK reporting-restriction rules with statute citations.

Not legal advice. This tool flags commonly applicable rules only, from the facts you enter. Always take specialist legal advice for high-risk stories — see disclaimer.

Select all five options above to see whether you can name this person.

General guidance based on statute and code positions. Always take specialist legal advice for high-risk stories. See /disclaimer.


IPSO Clause Selector

Pick the editorial situation you are dealing with to see which clause(s) of the IPSO Editors’ Code of Practice are most likely to apply, what each requires, and where to read more.

Not legal advice, and not a substitute for the Code. This tool paraphrases clauses to help you navigate them. Always read the current Editors’ Code at ipso.co.uk and see our disclaimer. IPSO regulates most, but not all, UK publishers — some are regulated by IMPRESS or self-regulate.

Select a situation above to see the relevant clause(s).

Clause summaries are paraphrased from the IPSO Editors’ Code of Practice for navigation only. Always rely on the current Code text and take editorial-legal advice on difficult cases. See /disclaimer.

Recent IPSO rulings

as of 2026-08-13

How IPSO has recently applied the Editors’ Code — each ruling shows the outcome it reached and the clause(s) engaged. Useful for seeing what a complaint under each clause looks like in practice.

Source: IPSO rulings · retrieved 2026-08-13· a rolling sample; read each ruling in full for the reasoning.


Ofcom Section Selector

Pick a broadcast situation to see which section of the Ofcom Broadcasting Code applies, what it governs, and who is able to complain. For licensed TV and radio (including the BBC’s broadcast output) — not the press.

Not legal advice, and not a substitute for the Code. This tool paraphrases the Code for navigation. Always read the current Broadcasting Code at ofcom.org.uk and see our disclaimer.

Select a situation above to see the relevant Code section.

Section summaries are paraphrased from the Ofcom Broadcasting Code for navigation only. Always rely on the current Code text and take advice on difficult cases. See /disclaimer.

Notable Ofcom broadcast sanctions

as of 2026-08-13

The serious end of Broadcasting Code enforcement — statutory sanctions (fines and, in the gravest cases, licence revocations) show where Ofcom draws the line on impartiality, harm and offence, and fairness.

  • GB News Limited

    Ofcom has imposed statutory sanctions on GB News Limited for breaching the special impartiality requirements in the programme People’s Forum: The Prime Minister broadcast on 12 February 2024.

  • ANO TV Novosti

    Ofcom has today revoked RT's licence to broadcast in the UK, with immediate effect.

  • China Global Television Network

    Ofcom has today withdrawn the licence for CGTN to broadcast in the UK, after its investigation concluded that the licence is wrongfully held by Star China Media Limited.

  • Islam Channel Limited

    Ofcom has imposed a £20,000 fine on Islam Channel Limited in relation to its service the Islam Channel for failing to comply with our broadcasting rules.

  • BBC

    Ofcom has imposed a sanction on the BBC after we found that a documentary programme breached broadcasting rules which require that factual programmes must not materially mislead the audience

  • Khalsa Television Limited

    Ofcom has imposed financial penalties of £20,000 and £30,000 on Khalsa Television Limited in relation to its service KTV for failing to comply with our broadcasting rules.

  • Club TV Limited

    Ofcom has imposed a £200,000 fine on Club TV Limited in relation to its service Peace TV Urdu for failing to comply with our broadcasting rules.

  • 965 TV Limited

    Ofcom has imposed a sanction on 965 TV Limited after our investigation found that it had failed to comply with our advertising rules on its Studio 66 TV service.

Source: Ofcom content sanctions & adjudications · retrieved 2026-08-13· a curated selection; see Ofcom for the full record.


Public Interest Test Builder

Build a documented public interest record for your editorial file. IPSO and NUJ both expect public interest decisions to be recorded in writing.

Information only — not legal advice. This record supports your editorial decision-making process. It does not constitute a legal defence without supporting evidence. See full disclaimer.

Public interest grounds * (select at least one)


Right of Reply Generator

Generate a professional request-for-comment letter. Putting allegations to the subject before publication is required by the IPSO Editors' Code (Clause 1) and the NUJ Code of Conduct.

Information only — not legal advice. This template assists editorial practice. It does not replace legal review for serious allegations. See full disclaimer.

Deadline: 5pm on Tuesday, 18 August 2026


Corrections Generator

Generate a corrections notice formatted for your CMS. For our full corrections policy, see the corrections page.

Information only — not legal advice. Publishing a correction does not automatically discharge a legal liability. Seek legal advice for significant misrepresentation complaints. See full disclaimer.
Factual — minor

AI Disclosure Checklist

Determine whether you need to disclose AI use in your published work, and generate sample disclosure text. Guidance: NUJ AI guidance and IPSO position.

Information only — not legal advice. AI disclosure standards are evolving. Check the latest NUJ and IPSO guidance for your publication type. See full disclaimer.

What was AI used for? (check all that apply)

Were facts independently verified by a human?

Is the published version primarily AI-generated content?


Ethics Decision Flowchart

Answer the questions below to check whether your story is ready for publication from an ethical and legal standpoint.

Question 1 of 8

Does your story involve private or personal information about an individual?


Word Counter

Paste or type your text below to see live word count, reading time and structure stats.

Paste your text above to see word count and reading time.


Headline Checker

Check your headline for length, structure, clickbait flags and IPSO accuracy requirements.

Enter a headline above to check it.

Freelance Business

15 tools

Rate calculator, pitch generators (simple + advanced), printable invoices, late-payment escalation letters, kill-fee claims and letters, day-rate quotes, NUJ rate comparator, copyright licence fee estimator, byline generator, contact card maker, story budget tracker, expense deduction calculator and downloadable templates.

Freelance Rate Calculator

Estimate what to charge based on assignment type, publication tier and your experience level.

Select all three options above to see your estimated rate.


Pitch Email Generator

Fill in the details below to generate a professional pitch email you can copy and send.


Advanced Pitch Generator

Build a structured, professional pitch email with all the detail commissioning editors expect.

0/80 suggested

0/200

Tip: Keep your subject line under 60 characters so it displays fully on mobile. Editors receive dozens of pitches daily — lead with your strongest angle and be specific about what makes this story urgent and exclusive to their readers.

Invoice Generator

Fill in your details and line items, then print a professional A4 invoice or copy as plain text.

Your Details

Invoice Details

Client Details

Line Items

£0.00
Subtotal£0.00Total Due£0.00

Payment due: 15 September 2026

VAT note:If you are VAT-registered, charge 20% standard rate unless the service is zero-rated or exempt. The threshold for compulsory VAT registration is £90,000 (2025/26 tax year). Check HMRC guidance if you are unsure.

Late Payment Calculator

Calculate statutory interest and compensation for overdue invoices under the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998.

Enter the invoice amount and number of days overdue to calculate interest.


Late Payment Letter Generator

Generate a professionally worded letter to chase overdue invoices — from polite reminder to final notice before legal action.

Tip: Use the Late Payment Calculator to compute exact statutory interest and compensation owed before sending a firm reminder or final notice.
Disclaimer: These letter templates are for guidance only and do not constitute legal advice. For complex disputes or large sums, consider consulting a solicitor or contacting the NUJ Freelance Office. The Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998 applies to commercial transactions — check applicability if your client is an individual rather than a business.

Kill Fee Calculator

Calculate what you are owed when a commission is killed and generate a claim email to send to the commissioning editor.

NUJ guidance: If no kill-fee clause exists in your contract, 50% is the conventional minimum for work substantially completed. Industry practice varies — always confirm payment terms in writing before starting commissioned work.

Kill Fee Letter Templater

Generate a professional kill-fee claim letter, with statutory interest referenced under the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998.

Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998: as a business creditor, you may be entitled to statutory interest (Bank of England base rate + 8%, illustrative) plus fixed compensation once a commercial debt is overdue. This is included in the letter as a reminder, not a demand — most kill-fee disputes resolve without needing to invoke it.

Day Rate Quote Calculator

Build a detailed quote with line-item breakdown and rights multiplier — then copy or print for your client.

Your Rates

Scope of Work

Multiplier: ×1 applied to subtotal

Tip: Always quote in writing. If a client agrees verbally, follow up with an email confirming scope, fee, and payment terms within 24 hours. This creates a paper trail and protects you if the commission is later disputed or killed.

NUJ Rate vs Day Rate Comparator

Compare the NUJ Freelance Fees Guide recommended minimum against a typical UK market day-rate range for the same assignment.

Select an assignment type and outlet type to compare rates.



Byline Clarifier & Generator

Add authors with roles to generate a correctly formatted byline string.

Add author names and roles above, then click Generate.


Contact Card Maker

Build a journalist contact card and download it as a .vcf file or copy as plain text.

Fill in at least a name to generate the card.


Story Budget Calculator

Track weekly story assignments and spot reporter overallocation. Data is saved in your browser.

Reporter workload this week

Enter reporter names above to see workload.


Total budgeted hours0.0hStories in budget1

Expense Deduction Calculator

Estimate your UK self-assessment deductible expenses and tax saving as a freelance journalist.

Home office method

Deductible expense breakdown

Home office (flat rate)£0.00Mileage allowance£0.00Equipment£0.00Professional subscriptions£0.00Accountant / legal fees£0.00Rail / flights / hotels£0.00

Total deductible£0.00

Estimated tax saving

Basic rate (20%)£0.00Higher rate (40%)£0.00Additional rate (45%)£0.00
Estimate only. Always confirm with a qualified accountant. Verify current HMRC mileage rates and flat rates at gov.uk before filing.

Downloadable Templates

Click any template to view the full text. Use the Print button to save as PDF or print a hard copy.

Safety & Verification

9 tools

Document risk before publication, audit source-protection practice, verify social media content with traffic-light confidence scoring, check password strength, run source verification checklists, use the advanced ethics flowchart and compare NCTJ training costs.

Story Risk Register

Document and rate risks across five categories before publication. Print and store with your story file.

Overall Risk Rating: Not assessed

Legal Risk

Defamation, contempt, copyright, data protection

Risk:

Ethical Risk

Privacy, intrusion, public interest balance

Risk:

Safety Risk

Physical, online abuse, source safety

Risk:

Source Risk

Anonymity, reliability, motives

Risk:

Reputational Risk

Corrections likelihood, criticism, financial

Risk:
Save or print this register and store with your story file. Editors and lawyers will ask for it if anything goes wrong.

Source Protection Checklist

Answer Yes or No for each item. Every answer is required — this checklist demands commitment, not uncertainty.

1.Did I agree the level of anonymity in writing with the source (off-record / on-background / not-for-attribution / on-record)?

2.Are we communicating through an encrypted channel (Signal, ProtonMail, SecureDrop)?

3.Have I avoided naming the source in emails, calendar invites, or shared documents?

4.Have I stored notes (digital + paper) in a way the source cannot be identified by them alone?

5.Have I stripped metadata from any documents the source sent (e.g. via DocumentCloud or manual EXIF cleaning)?

6.Have I considered whether my device(s) are secure (full-disk encryption, strong passphrase, OS updated)?

7.Have I considered whether cloud backups or syncs (iCloud, Google Drive) could expose source material?

8.Have I considered whether the source's own digital footprint identifies them (their email metadata, badge logs, building access)?

9.Have I considered whether the source could be identified by exclusion ("only X people knew this") and discussed this with them?

10.Have I considered RIPA/IPA powers — police or state could demand my communications data?

11.Have I considered whether a Production Order could be made against me (PACE s.9, Sch.1) and where my notes physically sit?

12.Do I know the NUJ's source protection guidance and have a lawyer contact in case of legal pressure?

0/12 answered
This checklist is a starting point. High-risk source protection scenarios (e.g. state actors, criminal investigations) require professional security advice and possibly legal counsel.

Social Media Verification Checklist

Answer Yes or No for each verification step before using social media content in a story.

1.Have I traced the content to its original source (not a screenshot of a screenshot)?

2.Have I checked the account's history (created when, posting frequency, language patterns)?

3.Does the account have a verified blue tick or established credible footprint?

4.Have I cross-referenced the claim with a second independent source?

5.Have I run a reverse image search (Google Lens, TinEye, Yandex) on any images?

6.Have I checked timestamps against the claimed event time (and timezone)?

7.Have I geolocated images/video against known landmarks, signage, language?

8.Have I checked image metadata where available (EXIF — but note social platforms strip it)?

9.Have I checked video for editing signs (jumps, audio glitches, unnatural shadows)?

10.If the content is sensitive (atrocity, death, identifiable victims), have I assessed it ethically before publishing?

11.Do I have permission from the original poster, OR is the content clearly newsworthy enough to use under fair dealing?

12.Have I screen-captured the content with URL and timestamp visible (in case the post is deleted)?

0/12 answered
User-generated content (UGC) raises copyright concerns. Where possible, get explicit permission from the rights-holder before publication.

Source Verification Checklist

Work through all 12 questions before publishing. Answer “Yes” or “No” for each item. A strong source should score at least 10 out of 12.

Verification score0 / 12 yes — 0%

1Have you contacted the source directly (not relying solely on third-party accounts)?

2Do you have written or recorded confirmation from the source?

3Have you cross-checked the source against Companies House, Land Registry, or another official register if relevant?

4Is the source identifiable (name, title, organisation) and have you verified their identity?

5Have you sought a second independent source to corroborate the key claim?

6Have you checked the source's track record for accuracy in previous statements?

7Have you given the subject of the story a proper right of reply?

8Are you confident the source has no undisclosed conflict of interest?

9Have you verified any documents provided by the source (checked provenance, metadata, format)?

10Have you checked whether any of the information is sub judice or subject to a reporting restriction?

11Have you consulted your publication's legal team or a media lawyer if there is any doubt?

12Would you be comfortable explaining your verification process in a published Editor's Note?

Questions answered0 / 12
Yes answers0
No answers0
Unanswered12

Password Strength Checker

Check how secure your password is against common attack patterns. No data is sent anywhere — all checks run in your browser.

Enter a password above to check its strength.

Ethics Flowchart

A step-by-step ethical decision guide for UK journalists, referencing IPSO Editors' Code and the NUJ Code of Conduct.

Does the story involve a person who may be adversely affected?


NCTJ Training Provider Fee Comparison

A side-by-side breakdown of UK NCTJ-accredited course fees and exam costs across leading providers. Fees are approximate and verified as of June 2026.

ProviderLocationDeliveryCourse FeeNCTJ ExamsTotal Est.Notes
News AssociatesLondon / ManchesterFull-time / Part-time / Online£3,495 – £4,495Included£3,495 – £4,495Fast-track options available; often ranked #1 NCTJ centre
Press Association TrainingLondon (primarily)Full-time / Online£3,600 – £5,000Included£3,600 – £5,000Industry-backed; strong broadcast pathway
City, University of LondonLondonFull-time (postgraduate)£12,500 – £14,000Included£12,500 – £14,000MA Journalism; prestigious; includes NCTJ fast-track
NMA Academy (National Media Academy)BirminghamFull-time / Apprenticeship£2,800 – £4,200Included£2,800 – £4,200Apprenticeship route available; good Midlands network
Lambeth College / NCTJ DirectLondon / OnlinePart-time / Online£1,800 – £2,500£850 approx (separate)£2,650 – £3,350Lower cost entry; exam fees billed separately by NCTJ

Last reviewed: 13 June 2026. Fees are approximate and subject to change — always verify directly with the provider before applying.

Note on NCTJ exam fees:NCTJ exam fees are set by NCTJ and change annually. Some centres bundle them; others charge separately. Budget an additional £800–£1,000 if not included.

FOI Cost Estimator

Estimate whether your Freedom of Information request is likely to exceed the statutory cost limit under section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (£600 for central government, £450 for other public authorities, calculated at £25/hour).

Select all four options above to see your estimated cost outcome.

Note:This is an illustrative estimate only, using the statutory £25/hour rate set out in the Freedom of Information and Data Protection (Appropriate Limit and Fees) Regulations 2004. Only time spent determining whether the information is held, locating, retrieving and extracting it counts toward the limit — not time spent considering exemptions or redacting. Not legal advice.

Byline Impact Tracker

Log every published byline to track your monthly output, outlet mix and portfolio growth. Data is saved in your browser only.

No bylines logged yet. Add your first one above.


Pitch Success Rate Calculator

Track every pitch you send and its outcome to see your acceptance rate, response times, and which editors and angles work best. Data is saved in your browser only.

No pitches logged yet. Add your first one above.


Source Verification Confidence Checker

Get a 0–100 confidence score based on source type, corroboration, and how many verification steps you've completed, plus a red/amber/green publication recommendation.

Verification steps completed0 / 10

1Have you contacted the source directly (not relying solely on third-party accounts)?

2Do you have written or recorded confirmation from the source?

3Have you cross-checked the source against Companies House, Land Registry, or another official register if relevant?

4Is the source identifiable to you (name, title, organisation), even if not published?

5Have you sought a second independent source to corroborate the key claim?

6Have you checked the source's track record for accuracy in previous statements?

7Have you given the subject of the story a proper right of reply?

8Are you confident the source has no undisclosed conflict of interest?

9Have you verified any documents provided (checked provenance, metadata, format)?

10Have you checked whether any of the information is sub judice or subject to a reporting restriction?

Select source type, corroborating source count, and answer all 10 questions to see your confidence score.


Harassment Response Flowchart

A step-by-step guide for UK journalists facing harassment, abuse or threats connected to their work. Answer the questions below for tailored next steps.

Step 1 of 3

Not legal advice. This tool provides general guidance only. If you are in immediate danger, call 999. For non-emergency police reporting, call 101. Always seek advice from your employer, the NUJ, or a solicitor for your specific situation.

Quick Converters

Word Count to Read Time

Based on average reading speed of 238 wpm.

VAT Calculator

Calculate net to gross at UK standard 20% VAT.

Looking for guides as well as tools?

Every tool here is paired with explainer guides on the topic hubs.

Browse all hubs