Skip to main content

Home › Tools

UK Journalist Tools & Calculators

51 free, client-side tools for UK journalists across FOI workflow, editorial and legal checks, freelance business, and source safety. No signup, no AI cost, no data sent anywhere.

Last reviewed: Next review due:

FOI Workflow

5 tools

Calculate FOI deadlines, draft requests for any UK authority type, appeal refusals using the right exemption, escalate to the ICO, and pick between FOIA and the Environmental Information Regulations.

FOI Deadline Calculator

Calculate your 20-working-day deadline under section 10 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Enter the date you sent the request and this tool returns the statutory deadline, a 15-day reminder, and a chase date — plus a ready-to-send follow-up email.

The clock starts the day after the authority receives your request (or the day you send it if sent electronically and received during business hours).

How the count works: section 10(6) of the Act defines a working day as any day other than a Saturday, a Sunday, Christmas Day, Good Friday, or a bank holiday in any part of the United Kingdom. So a Scottish or Northern Irish bank holiday extends the deadline for an English authority too, and this calculator counts all three nations' holidays. It does not model the section 10(2) suspension that applies while a fees notice is outstanding.Source: GOV.UK bank holidays · retrieved 2026-09-27 · covers 2019–2028 · check current at source

FOI Deadline Calculator: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


FOI Request Builder

Generate a formal Freedom of Information Act 2000 request letter, tailored to the type of public authority. Fill in the details and copy or print the ready-to-send letter.

Tip: WhatDoTheyKnow.com publishes requests and responses — great for researching how similar requests were handled and following up on published data.

FOI Request Builder: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


FOI Appeal Builder

Generate an internal review request after a Freedom of Information refusal. An internal review is normally expected before you complain to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), though section 50(2)(a) makes that the Commissioner's discretion rather than a bar. Fill in the details and copy or print the letter.

Authority claims the request would cost over £600 (central government) or £450 (other public bodies) to process. Check if the request can be narrowed to bring it within the cost limit.

Next step: If the internal review upholds the refusal, you have the right to complain to the Information Commissioner's Office under section 50 of FOIA. Use the ICO Complaint Builder tool to draft your complaint.

FOI Appeal Builder: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


ICO Complaint Builder

Generate a formal complaint to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) after an internal review fails to resolve your FOI dispute. The ICO normally expects you to complete an internal review first, but section 50(2)(a) makes that its discretion rather than a bar — if the authority never responded, or is not conducting the review, say so. Ordinarily the ICO will investigate. Fill in the details, tick the documents you are enclosing, then copy or print.

Evidence checklist — tick documents you have ready to enclose

Online submission: You can submit this complaint directly at ico.org.uk/make-a-complaint — the ICO does not publish a fixed service standard for how long a Decision Notice takes, and in our experience it varies considerably with the ICO's caseload and the complexity of the complaint, so treat any timescale you are given as an estimate rather than a commitment. The ICO has the power to order disclosure and can name the authority publicly in its Decision Notice.

ICO Complaint Builder: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Recent ICO decision notices (FOIA)

as of 2026-09-28

How the Information Commissioner has recently ruled on Freedom of Information Act complaints — the public authority, the FOIA section(s) engaged, and whether the complaint was upheld. A useful gauge of what the ICO expects and where authorities most often fall short (section 10, the 20‑working‑day deadline, recurs often).

  • London Borough of BrentFOI 1: Upheld, FOI 10: Upheld

    The complainant requested information from London Borough of Brent (the council) about Rapid Reviews following serious child safeguarding incidents. The Commissioner found that the council held information within the scope of the request but failed to identify it within the statutory time limit, bre

    Local government · 18 September 2026 · IC-409325-G3N3
  • NHS EnglandFOI 40(2): Not upheld, FOI 42(1): Not upheld, FOI 10(3): Not upheld

    The complainant requested information about the appointment of Dame Marianne Griffiths as Chair of the North East and Yorkshire Regional Independent Review of the North East Ambulance Service. NHS England (NHSE) disclosed relevant information and relied on sections 40(2) and 42(1) of FOIA to withhol

    Health · 17 September 2026 · IC-446764-V5D1
  • Information Commissioner's OfficeFOI 1: Not upheld, FOI 16: Not upheld

    The complainant has requested information about the internal policy documents relied upon when decisions were made in their complaint cases. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) stated that it did not hold the requested information.

    Other · 17 September 2026 · IC-433260-M0Z7
  • The public authority has failed to respond to this request within 20 working days, as specified under FOIA. The Commissioner requires it to provide the complainant with a response to this request within 30 calendar days in accordance with its obligations under FOIA.

    Local government · 17 September 2026 · IC-547393-Z6Z9
  • South Gloucestershire CouncilFOI 12(1): Not upheld, FOI 16(1): Upheld

    The complainant requested from South Gloucestershire Council (the Council) information regarding complaints received by Trading Standards relating to supermarkets selling food past its use-by date. The Council provided information in response to the first question.

    Local government · 17 September 2026 · IC-427669-J2D9
  • Maritime and Coastguard AgencyFOI 40(2): Not upheld

    The complainant has requested transcripts of audio calls relating to a particular search and rescue incident. The Maritime and Coastguard Agency (“MCA”) disclosed some of the information, but withheld the information at part 1 of the request in accordance with section 40(2) (personal information) of

    Central government · 17 September 2026 · IC-433491-W8M0
  • HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC)FOI 1: Not upheld, FOI 14(1): Not upheld, FOI 31(1)(d): Not upheld

    The complainant has requested information about the training delivered to officers assessing R&D claims for tax relief . HMRC refused the complainant’s initial request and refined request with reliance on section 14(1)(vexatiousness).

    Central government · 17 September 2026 · IC-420394-J5R3
  • The complainant has requested information about fatal drowning incidents and hoax or false-alarm callouts on the Redcar coastline. The Maritime and Coastguard Agency (‘the MCA’) relied on section 21 of FOIA (information accessible to the applicant by other means) to withhold the information requeste

    Central government · 17 September 2026 · IC-429739-G2S3
  • Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office FCDO (previously FCO)FOI 10: Upheld, FOI 17: Upheld, FOI 31: Partly upheld, FOI 38: Upheld, FOI 40: Not upheld

    The complainant submitted a request to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) seeking communications relating to the travel and accommodation arrangements for the then Duke of York’s visit to Azerbaijan in June 2009. The FCDO disclosed some information in response to the request but w

    Central government · 16 September 2026 · IC-483236-W8X1
  • The LBI has failed to respond to this request within 20 working days, as specified under FOIA. The Commissioner requires it to provide the complainant with a response to this request within 30 calendar days in accordance with its obligations under FOIA.

    Local government · 16 September 2026 · IC-544816-C0W5
  • Ministry of Justice (MoJ)FOI 3: Not upheld

    The complainants requested information relating to the management of a specified building. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) denied holding the requested information.

    Central government · 16 September 2026 · IC-461553-N6S7
  • The complainant requested information from Brighton and Hove City Council relating to West Blatchington Primary and Nursery School. The Commissioner’s decision is that the public authority failed to respond to the request within 20 working days and has therefore breached section 10 of FOIA.

    Local government · 16 September 2026 · IC-547578-K4G5

Source: ICO decision notices · retrieved 2026-09-28 · a rolling sample of FOIA notices; read each in full for the Commissioner’s reasoning.


EIR vs FOI Selector

Should you make your request under the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR) or the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA)?

The EIR applies whenever information is ‘environmental’ in nature — and crucially, it covers private companies carrying out public functions related to the environment (e.g. water companies, energy utilities), which FOIA does not. Answer the questions below to find out which regime applies to your request.

Question 1 of 60%

Does the information relate to the state of the environment (air, water, soil, biodiversity, landscape, or protected sites)?

FOI vs EIR Selector: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do

Find your patch

Enter any UK postcode to find the public bodies that cover it — the starting point for local reporting and FOI.

Find Your Patch: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do

Editorial & Legal

15 tools

Pre-publication legal checks (defamation, contempt, reporting restrictions), public-interest documentation, right-of-reply emails, correction generators, AI disclosure recommendations, headline checker, word counter and byline generator. None of these are legal advice — see disclaimer.

Defamation Risk Checklist

Answer all 10 questions to assess your defamation risk under the Defamation Act 2013.

Information only — not legal advice. This tool provides editorial guidance. For serious-harm allegations always consult a qualified media lawyer. See full disclaimer.

Q1 — Identification

Is anyone identifiable from the publication (named OR identifiable by context, role, photo)?

Q2 — Defamatory meaning

Could a reasonable reader think less of them as a result?

Q3 — Serious harm

Is the harm to their reputation likely to be serious (or for companies: serious financial loss)?

Q4 — Truth (substantial truth)

Can you prove the substance of what you say is true with documentary or testimonial evidence?

Q5 — Honest opinion

If it's opinion, is it clearly opinion (not stated as fact), based on facts stated/referenced, and one a reasonable person could hold?

Q6 — Public interest defence (s.4)

Is publication in the public interest AND did you reasonably believe so at time of publication?

Q7 — Privilege

Does absolute or qualified privilege apply (court report, parliamentary, regulatory bodies)?

Q8 — Right of reply

Have you put allegations to the subject in advance with a reasonable deadline?

Q9 — Evidence file

Do you have a documented evidence file (notes, recordings, documents) you could produce in court?

Q10 — Legal read

Has a qualified media lawyer reviewed (recommended for serious-harm allegations)?

Defamation Risk Checklist: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Defamation Risk Score

Answer these questions about your story to get an indicative defamation risk score, referencing the Defamation Act 2013.

Not legal advice. This tool gives an illustrative indicator only, based on general principles of English and Welsh defamation law. Always seek qualified legal advice for any story carrying real defamation risk.

Answer all questions above to see your risk indicator.

Defamation Risk Score: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Contempt of Court Checker

Answer all 10 questions to assess your contempt risk under the Contempt of Court Act 1981.

Information only — not legal advice. Contempt of court carries criminal liability. Always consult a qualified media lawyer when proceedings are active. See full disclaimer.

1.Has anyone been arrested without charge in connection with the story?

2.Has anyone been charged with an offence in this story?

3.Has a warrant been issued for someone in this story?

4.Has a summons been issued?

5.Is the matter set for jury trial?

6.Are you reporting previous convictions of an accused before trial?

7.Are you reporting confessions, alleged confessions, or "off-the-record" admissions?

8.Are you running identification photographs of an accused where ID is in issue?

9.Is there a Section 4(2) postponement order, Section 11 anonymity order or reporting restriction?

10.Are you commenting on the credibility of witnesses or the strength of the case?

Contempt Checker: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Contempt Timeline Tracker

Track active-proceedings status for cases you are covering, and get a strict-liability window warning under the Contempt of Court Act 1981 s.2. Saved locally in your browser only.

Not legal advice. This is an illustrative reminder tool only. Contempt risk depends on the specific content published, not just dates. Always seek legal advice for reporting on active criminal proceedings.

No cases tracked yet. Add a case above to see its active-proceedings status.

Suggested publication holds while active: avoid assertions of guilt or innocence, previous convictions, disputed confessions, identification evidence, and character/credibility commentary on witnesses or the accused. Factual, contemporaneous, fair reporting of what happens in open court is normally protected (s.4 CCA 1981), but commentary beyond that carries risk.

Contempt Timeline Tracker: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Reporting Restrictions Checklist

Answer yes or no to identify applicable UK court reporting restrictions before publication.

Information only — not legal advice. Always check the court list on the day and obtain the exact wording of any order. Breaching a restriction order is contempt of court. See full disclaimer.

1.Are any participants under 18 (youth court — automatic s.49 anonymity)?

Children and Young Persons Act 1933, s.49

2.Is the case in adult court but you want to identify a juvenile victim/witness? (s.45 YJCEA discretionary order)

Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, s.45

3.Is it a sexual offence — alleged victim has anonymity for life plus 25 years (s.1 Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992)?

Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992, s.1

4.Is the case in the Family Court? (s.97 Children Act 1989)

Children Act 1989, s.97; Family Procedure Rules 2010, r.27.11

5.Has the judge made a Section 4(2) postponement order (delay publication of certain matter until trial ends)?

Contempt of Court Act 1981, s.4(2)

6.Has the judge made a Section 11 anonymity order (e.g. blackmail victims, national security)?

Contempt of Court Act 1981, s.11

7.Are special measures in place for vulnerable witnesses (screens, video link)?

Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, ss.23–30

8.Is there a derogatory mitigation order (s.58 CPIA 1996)?

Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, ss.58-61

9.Is the trial subject to a reporting restriction the court has made privately (check court list)?

Various — check court listing

10.Are you in a youth court where adult co-accused are tried — section 49 may still apply to youth?

Children and Young Persons Act 1933, s.49 (as extended)

Reporting Restrictions Checklist: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Reporting Restriction Checker

Select the court, case type, stage of proceedings and whether an under-18 witness or victim is involved to see which UK reporting restrictions are likely to apply, with the relevant statute.

Not legal advice. This tool flags commonly applicable restrictions only. Individual court orders (postponement, anonymity, reporting-restriction orders under s.4(2) or s.11 CCA 1981) can add or lift restrictions in a specific case — always check for a live order before publishing.

Select all four options above to see applicable reporting restrictions.

Reporting Restriction Checker: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Court Active-Proceedings Calculator

Work out when criminal proceedings became “active” for strict-liability contempt purposes under the Contempt of Court Act 1981, and when that active period is likely to end.

Not legal advice. Active status ends on a qualifying event (verdict, sentence, discontinuance), not on a calendar date. The estimated range below is illustrative only, based on typical case timelines — always check the actual case status before relying on it.

Complete the fields above to calculate the active-proceedings window.

Active Proceedings Calculator: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Can I Name Them? Decision Engine

Enter details of the person you want to name, the court context, and any orders — get the applicable UK reporting-restriction rules with statute citations.

Not legal advice. This tool flags commonly applicable rules only, from the facts you enter. Always take specialist legal advice for high-risk stories — see disclaimer.

Select all five options above to see whether you can name this person.

General guidance based on statute and code positions. Always take specialist legal advice for high-risk stories. See /disclaimer.

Can I Name Them?: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


IPSO Clause Selector

Pick the editorial situation you are dealing with to see which clause(s) of the IPSO Editors’ Code of Practice are most likely to apply, what each requires, and where to read more.

Not legal advice, and not a substitute for the Code. This tool paraphrases clauses to help you navigate them. Always read the current Editors’ Code at ipso.co.uk and see our disclaimer. IPSO regulates most, but not all, UK publishers — some are regulated by IMPRESS or self-regulate.

Select a situation above to see the relevant clause(s).

Clause summaries are paraphrased from the IPSO Editors’ Code of Practice for navigation only. Always rely on the current Code text and take editorial-legal advice on difficult cases. See /disclaimer.

IPSO Clause Selector: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do

IPSO rulings: snapshot, 3 September 2026

How IPSO has recently applied the Editors’ Code — each ruling shows the outcome it reached and the clause(s) engaged. Useful for seeing what a complaint under each clause looks like in practice. IPSO does not permit automated retrieval of its rulings, so this is a point-in-time snapshot rather than a live feed — search IPSO’s own rulings database for anything current.

Source: IPSO rulings · snapshot retrieved 3 September 2026 · read each ruling in full for the reasoning.


Ofcom Section Selector

Pick a broadcast situation to see which section of the Ofcom Broadcasting Code applies, what it governs, and who is able to complain. For licensed TV and radio (including the BBC’s broadcast output) — not the press.

Not legal advice, and not a substitute for the Code. This tool paraphrases the Code for navigation. Always read the current Broadcasting Code at ofcom.org.uk and see our disclaimer.

Select a situation above to see the relevant Code section.

Section summaries are paraphrased from the Ofcom Broadcasting Code for navigation only. Always rely on the current Code text and take advice on difficult cases. See /disclaimer.

Ofcom Section Selector: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do

Notable Ofcom broadcast sanctions

as of 2026-09-28

The serious end of Broadcasting Code enforcement — statutory sanctions (fines and, in the gravest cases, licence revocations) show where Ofcom draws the line on impartiality, harm and offence, and fairness.

  • GB News Limited

    Ofcom has imposed statutory sanctions on GB News Limited for breaching the special impartiality requirements in the programme People’s Forum: The Prime Minister broadcast on 12 February 2024.

  • ANO TV Novosti

    Ofcom has today revoked RT's licence to broadcast in the UK, with immediate effect.

  • China Global Television Network

    Ofcom has today withdrawn the licence for CGTN to broadcast in the UK, after its investigation concluded that the licence is wrongfully held by Star China Media Limited.

  • Islam Channel Limited

    Ofcom has imposed a £20,000 fine on Islam Channel Limited in relation to its service the Islam Channel for failing to comply with our broadcasting rules.

  • BBC

    Ofcom has imposed a sanction on the BBC after we found that a documentary programme breached broadcasting rules which require that factual programmes must not materially mislead the audience

  • Khalsa Television Limited

    Ofcom has imposed financial penalties of £20,000 and £30,000 on Khalsa Television Limited in relation to its service KTV for failing to comply with our broadcasting rules.

  • Club TV Limited

    Ofcom has imposed a £200,000 fine on Club TV Limited in relation to its service Peace TV Urdu for failing to comply with our broadcasting rules.

  • 965 TV Limited

    Ofcom has imposed a sanction on 965 TV Limited after our investigation found that it had failed to comply with our advertising rules on its Studio 66 TV service.

Source: Ofcom content sanctions & adjudications · retrieved 2026-09-28 · a curated selection; see Ofcom for the full record.


Public Interest Test Builder

Build a documented public interest record for your editorial file. IPSO and NUJ both expect public interest decisions to be recorded in writing.

Information only — not legal advice. This record supports your editorial decision-making process. It does not constitute a legal defence without supporting evidence. See full disclaimer.

Public interest grounds * (select at least one)

Public Interest Test Builder: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Right of Reply Generator

Generate a professional request-for-comment letter. Putting allegations to the subject before publication is required by the IPSO Editors' Code (Clause 1) and the NUJ Code of Conduct.

Information only — not legal advice. This template assists editorial practice. It does not replace legal review for serious allegations. See full disclaimer.

Deadline: 5pm on

Right of Reply Generator: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Corrections Generator

Generate a corrections notice formatted for your CMS. For our full corrections policy, see the corrections page.

Information only — not legal advice. Publishing a correction does not automatically discharge a legal liability. Seek legal advice for significant misrepresentation complaints. See full disclaimer.
Factual — minor

Corrections Generator: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


AI Disclosure Checklist

Determine whether you need to disclose AI use in your published work, and generate sample disclosure text. Guidance: NUJ AI guidance and IPSO position.

Information only — not legal advice. AI disclosure standards are evolving. Check the latest NUJ and IPSO guidance for your publication type. See full disclaimer.

What was AI used for? (check all that apply)

Were facts independently verified by a human?

Is the published version primarily AI-generated content?

AI Disclosure Checklist: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Ethics Decision Flowchart

Answer the questions below to check whether your story is ready for publication from an ethical and legal standpoint.

Question 1 of 8

Does your story involve private or personal information about an individual?

Ethics Decision Flowchart: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Word Counter

Paste or type your text below to see live word count, reading time and structure stats.

Paste your text above to see word count and reading time.

Word Counter: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Headline Checker

Check your headline for length, structure, clickbait flags and IPSO accuracy requirements.

Enter a headline above to check it.

Headline Checker: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do

Freelance Business

15 tools

Rate calculator, pitch generators (simple + advanced), printable invoices, late-payment escalation letters, kill-fee claims and letters, day-rate quotes, NUJ rate comparator, copyright licence fee estimator, byline generator, contact card maker, story budget tracker, expense deduction calculator and downloadable templates.

Freelance Rate Calculator

Estimate what to charge based on assignment type, publication tier and your experience level.

Select all three options above to see your estimated rate.

Freelance Rate Calculator: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Pitch Email Generator

Fill in the details below to generate a professional pitch email you can copy and send.

Pitch Generator: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Advanced Pitch Generator

Build a structured, professional pitch email with all the detail commissioning editors expect.

0/80

0/200

Tip: Keep your headline under 80 characters so the subject line displays fully on mobile. Editors receive dozens of pitches daily — lead with your strongest angle and be specific about what makes this story urgent and exclusive to their readers.

Advanced Pitch Generator: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Invoice Generator

Fill in your details and line items, then print a professional A4 invoice or copy as plain text.

Your Details

Invoice Details

Client Details

Line Items

£0.00
Subtotal£0.00Total Due£0.00
VAT note: If you are VAT-registered, charge the 20% standard rate unless the service is zero-rated or exempt. The threshold for compulsory VAT registration is £90,000 (as of 2026-08-30). Check HMRC guidance if you are unsure.

Invoice Generator: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Late Payment Calculator

Calculate statutory interest and compensation for overdue invoices under the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998.

Enter the invoice amount and number of days overdue to calculate interest.

Late Payment Interest Calculator: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Late Payment Letter Generator

Generate a professionally worded letter to chase overdue invoices — from polite reminder to final notice before legal action.

Tip: Use the Late Payment Calculator to compute exact statutory interest and compensation owed before sending a firm reminder or final notice.
Disclaimer: These letter templates are for guidance only and do not constitute legal advice. For complex disputes or large sums, consider consulting a solicitor or contacting the NUJ Freelance Office. The Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998 applies to commercial transactions — check applicability if your client is an individual rather than a business.

Late Payment Letter Generator: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Kill Fee Calculator

Calculate what you are owed when a commission is killed and generate a claim email to send to the commissioning editor.

NUJ guidance: If no kill-fee clause exists in your contract, 50% is the conventional minimum for work substantially completed. Industry practice varies — always confirm payment terms in writing before starting commissioned work.

Kill Fee Calculator: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Kill Fee Letter Templater

Generate a professional kill-fee claim letter, with statutory interest referenced under the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998.

Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998: as a business creditor, you may be entitled to statutory interest (Bank of England base rate of 3.75%, as at 2026-09-27, plus 8 percentage points = 11.75% p.a.) plus fixed compensation once a commercial debt is overdue. This is included in the letter as a reminder, not a demand — most kill-fee disputes resolve without needing to invoke it.

Kill Fee Letter Templater: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Day Rate Quote Calculator

Build a detailed quote with line-item breakdown and rights multiplier — then copy or print for your client.

Your Rates

Scope of Work

Multiplier: ×1 applied to subtotal

Tip: Always quote in writing. If a client agrees verbally, follow up with an email confirming scope, fee, and payment terms within 24 hours. This creates a paper trail and protects you if the commission is later disputed or killed.

Day Rate Quote Builder: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


NUJ Rate vs Day Rate Comparator

Compare the NUJ Freelance Fees Guide recommended minimum against a typical UK market day-rate range for the same assignment.

Select an assignment type and outlet type to compare rates.

NUJ Rate vs Day Rate Comparator: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do



Byline Clarifier & Generator

Add authors with roles to generate a correctly formatted byline string.

Add author names and roles above, then click Generate.

Byline Clarifier Generator: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Contact Card Maker

Build a journalist contact card and download it as a .vcf file or copy as plain text.

Fill in at least a name to generate the card.

Contact Card Maker: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Story Budget Calculator

Track weekly story assignments and spot reporter overallocation. Data is saved in your browser.

Reporter workload this week

Enter reporter names above to see workload.


Total budgeted hours0.0hStories in budget1

Story Budget Calculator: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Expense Deduction Calculator

Estimate your UK self-assessment deductible expenses and tax saving as a freelance journalist.

Home office method

Deductible expense breakdown

Home office (flat rate)£0.00Mileage allowance£0.00Equipment£0.00Professional subscriptions£0.00Accountant / legal fees£0.00Rail / flights / hotels£0.00

Total deductible£0.00

Estimated tax saving

Basic rate (20%)£0.00Higher rate (40%)£0.00Additional rate (45%)£0.00
Estimate only. Always confirm with a qualified accountant. Verify current HMRC mileage rates and flat rates at gov.uk before filing.

Expense Deduction Calculator: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Downloadable Templates

Click any template to view the full text. Use the Print button to save as PDF or print a hard copy.

Safety & Verification

9 tools

Document risk before publication, audit source-protection practice, verify social media content with traffic-light confidence scoring, check password strength, run source verification checklists, use the advanced ethics flowchart and compare NCTJ training costs.

Story Risk Register

Document and rate risks across five categories before publication. Print and store with your story file.

Overall Risk Rating: Not assessed

Legal Risk

Defamation, contempt, copyright, data protection

Risk: —

Ethical Risk

Privacy, intrusion, public interest balance

Risk: —

Safety Risk

Physical, online abuse, source safety

Risk: —

Source Risk

Anonymity, reliability, motives

Risk: —

Reputational Risk

Corrections likelihood, criticism, financial

Risk: —
Save or print this register and store with your story file. Editors and lawyers will ask for it if anything goes wrong.

Story Risk Register: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Source Protection Checklist

Answer Yes or No for each item. Every answer is required — this checklist demands commitment, not uncertainty.

1.Did I agree the level of anonymity in writing with the source (off-record / on-background / not-for-attribution / on-record)?

2.Are we communicating through an encrypted channel (Signal, ProtonMail, SecureDrop)?

3.Have I avoided naming the source in emails, calendar invites, or shared documents?

4.Have I stored notes (digital + paper) in a way the source cannot be identified by them alone?

5.Have I stripped metadata from any documents the source sent (e.g. via DocumentCloud or manual EXIF cleaning)?

6.Have I considered whether my device(s) are secure (full-disk encryption, strong passphrase, OS updated)?

7.Have I considered whether cloud backups or syncs (iCloud, Google Drive) could expose source material?

8.Have I considered whether the source's own digital footprint identifies them (their email metadata, badge logs, building access)?

9.Have I considered whether the source could be identified by exclusion ("only X people knew this") and discussed this with them?

10.Have I considered RIPA/IPA powers — police or state could demand my communications data?

11.Have I considered whether a Production Order could be made against me (PACE s.9, Sch.1) and where my notes physically sit?

12.Do I know the NUJ's source protection guidance and have a lawyer contact in case of legal pressure?

0/12 answered
This checklist is a starting point. High-risk source protection scenarios (e.g. state actors, criminal investigations) require professional security advice and possibly legal counsel.

Source Protection Checklist: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Social Media Verification Checklist

Answer Yes or No for each verification step before using social media content in a story.

1.Have I traced the content to its original source (not a screenshot of a screenshot)?

2.Have I checked the account's history (created when, posting frequency, language patterns)?

3.Does the account have a verified blue tick or established credible footprint?

4.Have I cross-referenced the claim with a second independent source?

5.Have I run a reverse image search (Google Lens, TinEye, Yandex) on any images?

6.Have I checked timestamps against the claimed event time (and timezone)?

7.Have I geolocated images/video against known landmarks, signage, language?

8.Have I checked image metadata where available (EXIF — but note social platforms strip it)?

9.Have I checked video for editing signs (jumps, audio glitches, unnatural shadows)?

10.If the content is sensitive (atrocity, death, identifiable victims), have I assessed it ethically before publishing?

11.Do I have permission from the original poster, OR is the content clearly newsworthy enough to use under fair dealing?

12.Have I screen-captured the content with URL and timestamp visible (in case the post is deleted)?

0/12 answered
User-generated content (UGC) raises copyright concerns. Where possible, get explicit permission from the rights-holder before publication.

Social Media Verification Checklist: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Source Verification Checklist

Work through all 12 questions before publishing. Answer “Yes” or “No” for each item. A strong source should score at least 10 out of 12.

Verification score0 / 12 yes — 0%

1Have you contacted the source directly (not relying solely on third-party accounts)?

2Do you have written or recorded confirmation from the source?

3Have you cross-checked the source against Companies House, Land Registry, or another official register if relevant?

4Is the source identifiable (name, title, organisation) and have you verified their identity?

5Have you sought a second independent source to corroborate the key claim?

6Have you checked the source's track record for accuracy in previous statements?

7Have you given the subject of the story a proper right of reply?

8Are you confident the source has no undisclosed conflict of interest?

9Have you verified any documents provided by the source (checked provenance, metadata, format)?

10Have you checked whether any of the information is sub judice or subject to a reporting restriction?

11Have you consulted your publication's legal team or a media lawyer if there is any doubt?

12Would you be comfortable explaining your verification process in a published Editor's Note?

Questions answered0 / 12
Yes answers0
No answers0
Unanswered12

Source Verification Checklist: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Password Strength Checker

Check how secure your password is against common attack patterns. No data is sent anywhere — all checks run in your browser.

Enter a password above to check its strength.

Password Strength Checker: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Ethics Flowchart

A step-by-step ethical decision guide for UK journalists, referencing IPSO Editors' Code and the NUJ Code of Conduct.

Not legal advice. This tool flags commonly applicable ethical considerations only, from the answers you give. Always take specialist legal advice for high-risk stories — see disclaimer.

Does the story involve a person who may be adversely affected?

General guidance based on IPSO and NUJ code positions. Always take specialist legal advice for high-risk stories. See /disclaimer.

Ethics Flowchart: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


NCTJ Training Provider Fee Comparison

A side-by-side breakdown of UK NCTJ-accredited course fees and exam costs across leading providers. Fees are approximate and verified as of June 2026.

ProviderLocationDeliveryCourse FeeNCTJ ExamsTotal Est.Notes
News AssociatesLondon / ManchesterFull-time / Part-time / Online£3,495 – £4,495Included£3,495 – £4,495Fast-track options available; often ranked #1 NCTJ centre
Press Association TrainingLondon (primarily)Full-time / Online£3,600 – £5,000Included£3,600 – £5,000Industry-backed; strong broadcast pathway
City, University of LondonLondonFull-time (postgraduate)£12,500 – £14,000Included£12,500 – £14,000MA Journalism; prestigious; includes NCTJ fast-track
NMA Academy (National Media Academy)BirminghamFull-time / Apprenticeship£2,800 – £4,200Included£2,800 – £4,200Apprenticeship route available; good Midlands network
Lambeth College / NCTJ DirectLondon / OnlinePart-time / Online£1,800 – £2,500£850 approx (separate)£2,650 – £3,350Lower cost entry; exam fees billed separately by NCTJ

Last reviewed: 13 June 2026. Fees are approximate and subject to change — always verify directly with the provider before applying.

Note on NCTJ exam fees: NCTJ exam fees are set by NCTJ and change annually. Some centres bundle them; others charge separately. Budget an additional £800–£1,000 if not included.

NCTJ Exam Fee Comparison: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


FOI Cost Estimator

Estimate whether your Freedom of Information request is likely to exceed the statutory cost limit under section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (£600 for central government, £450 for other public authorities, calculated at £25/hour).

Select all four options above to see your estimated cost outcome.

Note: This is an illustrative estimate only, using the statutory £25/hour rate set out in the Freedom of Information and Data Protection (Appropriate Limit and Fees) Regulations 2004. Only time spent determining whether the information is held, locating, retrieving and extracting it counts toward the limit — not time spent considering exemptions or redacting. Not legal advice.

FOI Cost Estimator: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Byline Impact Tracker

Log every published byline to track your monthly output, outlet mix and portfolio growth. Data is saved in your browser only.

No bylines logged yet. Add your first one above.

Byline Impact Tracker: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Pitch Success Rate Calculator

Track every pitch you send and its outcome to see your acceptance rate, response times, and which editors and angles work best. Data is saved in your browser only.

No pitches logged yet. Add your first one above.

Pitch Success Rate Calculator: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Source Verification Confidence Checker

Get a 0–100 confidence score based on source type, corroboration, and how many verification steps you've completed, plus a red/amber/green publication recommendation.

Verification steps completed0 / 10

1Have you contacted the source directly (not relying solely on third-party accounts)?

2Do you have written or recorded confirmation from the source?

3Have you cross-checked the source against Companies House, Land Registry, or another official register if relevant?

4Is the source identifiable to you (name, title, organisation), even if not published?

5Have you sought a second independent source to corroborate the key claim?

6Have you checked the source's track record for accuracy in previous statements?

7Have you given the subject of the story a proper right of reply?

8Are you confident the source has no undisclosed conflict of interest?

9Have you verified any documents provided (checked provenance, metadata, format)?

10Have you checked whether any of the information is sub judice or subject to a reporting restriction?

Select source type, corroborating source count, and answer all 10 questions to see your confidence score.

Source Verification Confidence Checker: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Harassment Response Flowchart

A step-by-step guide for UK journalists facing harassment, abuse or threats connected to their work. Answer the questions below for tailored next steps.

Step 1 of 3

Not legal advice. This tool provides general guidance only. If you are in immediate danger, call 999. For non-emergency police reporting, call 101. Always seek advice from your employer, the NUJ, or a solicitor for your specific situation.

Harassment Response Flowchart: how it works, when to use it, and what it does not do


Quick Converters

Word Count to Read Time

Based on average reading speed of 238 wpm.

VAT Calculator

Calculate net to gross at UK standard 20% VAT.

Looking for guides as well as tools?

Every tool here is paired with explainer guides on the topic hubs.

Browse all hubs