What you need to know
Most UK journalists are now expected to produce at least basic graphics — social cards, quote graphics, simple charts, explainer panels — without a designer's help. The good news is that you do not need professional design training to do this well. Three tools cover almost everything a working journalist needs: Canva for quick everyday graphics, Figma for collaborative design and longer-form layouts, and Adobe Express for those already inside the Adobe ecosystem.
The difficult part is not the tool. It is applying journalistic standards to graphics: accurate, accessible, faithful to data, and consistent with your outlet's house style. A misleading bar chart or an inaccessible colour palette is a reputational and ethical risk under IPSO Editors' Code Clause 1 (Accuracy) and the equivalent IMPRESS and Ofcom standards.
Accessibility is non-negotiable. The Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) Accessibility Regulations 2018 require WCAG 2.1 AA compliance for public-sector publishers and most major UK newsrooms voluntarily match that standard. That means readable contrast, descriptive alt text, and never relying on colour alone to convey information.
When graphics decisions matter
- 1Producing a quote card or social media graphic to amplify a story — the framing of the quote matters.
- 2Building a chart to accompany a data story — readers will judge the story's accuracy by the chart.
- 3Designing an explainer panel summarising a complex piece — the visual hierarchy guides comprehension.
- 4Creating a series logo or branding for a recurring investigation — consistency builds reader recognition.
- 5Producing newsletter header graphics — these set the tone for every email a subscriber receives.
- 6Adapting a press release graphic — never republish a PR graphic as-is; verify and redraw.
- 7Translating a print layout to digital — print proportions rarely work on mobile.
- 8Building a comparison table or explainer graphic that may be screenshotted and shared without context.
Red flags in news graphics
- A bar chart with a truncated y-axis that exaggerates differences — declare the truncation or fix it.
- Colour contrast under 4.5:1 for normal text or 3:1 for graphical objects against background — fails WCAG 2.1 AA.
- A chart that uses red/green to distinguish categories without a secondary visual cue — inaccessible to readers with colour-vision deficiency.
- A photograph used as a background with text overlaid that becomes unreadable on certain crops.
- A graphic that contains a statistic or claim not present in the underlying story — graphics must not invent facts.
- A chart sourced from a PR agency that has not been independently verified before being adapted.
- Use of a competitor publication's graphic style or template — treat house style as a copyrighted asset.
- Missing or generic alt text — alt=“image” or no alt attribute at all.
Graphics production checklist
- I have the source data or quote in writing and have verified it independently.
- The graphic uses my publication's house typography and colour palette where one exists.
- Colour contrast meets WCAG 2.1 AA (4.5:1 for text, 3:1 for graphical objects).
- Any chart shows axis labels, units, and a data source citation in the graphic itself.
- Y-axis starts at zero for bar charts (or I have a documented reason and disclosure).
- Alt text describes both what the graphic shows and the headline finding.
- The graphic reads correctly at the smallest size it will appear (mobile, social thumbnail).
- If using stock imagery, I have a licence covering the intended use (editorial vs commercial).
- Credits and source citations are visible in the graphic, not just the article body.
- I have saved the editable source file (not just the export) so corrections are possible.
Templates and related guides
For house-style starters and accessibility checks, see our templates and the Editor Standards Pack. For data-driven graphics, see the Data Journalism hub.
Common mistakes
- Using template fonts that clash with your publication's typography — build a brand kit once and reuse it.
- Layering too many colours in a chart palette — three to five categorical colours is usually enough.
- Forgetting that social platforms crop graphics differently — check the safe areas for each surface (Instagram square, Twitter/X 16:9, LinkedIn 1.91:1).
- Using small body type below 14 pixels at display size — fails readability for older readers and many assistive contexts.
- Not exporting a high-resolution version for print or large-screen use — design at the largest size you will need.
- Treating chart and photograph captions as throwaway — under IPSO Clause 1, an inaccurate caption is as serious as inaccurate body copy.
- Skipping a final accessibility check — tools like Stark (Figma), Canva's accessibility checker, or browser dev tools will flag contrast issues.
Related guides
Primary sources
- Canva — free design tool with news templates— Canva
- Figma — collaborative design platform— Figma
- Adobe Express — quick graphics in the Adobe ecosystem— Adobe
- WCAG 2.1 Quick Reference— W3C
- UK Accessibility Regulations 2018 guidance— GOV.UK
- Office for Statistics Regulation — data presentation guidance— OSR
- IPSO Editors' Code of Practice— IPSO