Skip to main content

Building a House Style Guide for UK Newsrooms

How to write a style guide that pins down tone, accuracy standards, attribution conventions, inclusive language, photo treatment, and headline rules — grounded in the NUJ Code, IPSO Editors' Code, IMPRESS Standards, and BBC Editorial Guidelines.

Last reviewed: Next review due:

What a house style guide is — and why it matters

A house style guide is a written document that records the editorial conventions your newsroom has agreed to apply consistently across all published output. It covers language, punctuation, capitalisation, number formats, attribution rules, photo captions, and headline conventions — every choice that, left unresolved, would be made differently by different journalists on different days.

The case for having one rests on three pillars. First, consistency builds reader trust: when an outlet writes “per cent” sometimes and “%” other times, readers notice the sloppiness even if they cannot name it. Second, consistency reduces legal risk: accurate and consistent attribution practices make it harder for a claimant to argue that you misrepresented a source. Third, a written guide makes onboarding faster and cheaper — a new sub or reporter can absorb months of institutional knowledge in an afternoon.

The regulatory framework reinforces this. The IPSO Editors' Code requires publishers to take care not to publish inaccurate information and to distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture, and fact. The IMPRESS Standards Code requires proportionality, accuracy, and transparency. Neither code prescribes your style choices, but both hold you accountable for the consequences of them. A house style guide is how you demonstrate that editorial decisions are deliberate rather than accidental.

Regulatory anchors: the codes that shape your guide

Before writing a single rule, understand which regulatory regime applies to your outlet. IPSO members (the majority of UK national and regional press) are bound by the Editors' Code of Practice. IMPRESS-regulated publishers follow the IMPRESS Standards Code. The BBC follows its own Editorial Guidelines, which are the most detailed publicly available editorial policy document in UK journalism. None of these organisations publish a house style guide for you, but they establish the accuracy, attribution, and harm-avoidance obligations your guide must operationalise.

NUJ Code of Conduct

The professional baseline for individual journalists: accuracy, protecting sources, avoiding discrimination, and not producing material that incites hatred. Use it to frame your accuracy and inclusive language sections.

https://www.nuj.org.uk

IPSO Editors' Code

The regulatory floor for IPSO members on accuracy, privacy, harassment, intrusion into grief, reporting on children, and more. Your style guide should reflect these obligations explicitly.

https://www.ipso.co.uk/editors-code-of-practice

IMPRESS Standards Code

Covers accuracy, privacy, harassment, discrimination, and public interest. IMPRESS-regulated publishers should align their style guide with the Standards Code and its accompanying guidance notes.

https://impressorg.com

BBC Editorial Guidelines

The most comprehensive publicly available editorial policy document in UK journalism, covering accuracy, impartiality, harm and offence, fairness, privacy, and editorial integrity. Valuable as a reference even for non-BBC publishers.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines

Defining your tone

Tone is the personality of your outlet on the page. It is distinct from accuracy or attribution — those are obligations; tone is a choice. But it is one of the most important choices you make, because readers form an impression of your editorial character from tone before they have even evaluated a single fact.

The style guide should describe tone in terms that a journalist can act on. Abstract words like “authoritative” or “trusted” are aspirations, not instructions. Instead, answer concrete questions: Do you use contractions (“it's” rather than “it is”)? Do you write in second person to address the reader directly? Do you use colloquialisms or formal register? How do you handle irony and humour — or do you avoid them in news content entirely?

  • State whether your default register is formal, plain English, or conversational — and whether this varies by content type (news vs features vs opinion).
  • Specify whether contractions are permitted in news copy, feature copy, and headlines separately.
  • Address second-person address: permitted in explainers and guides, banned in news reports, or avoided entirely?
  • Clarify the treatment of irony, rhetorical questions, and understatement — and whether they are ever appropriate in straight news.
  • Set rules for sentence length and paragraph length: shorter is nearly always better online, but the guide should say so explicitly.
  • Note whether your outlet uses UK English spelling throughout (programme not program; favour not favor) and which dictionary is authoritative in cases of doubt.

Accuracy standards

Accuracy is not merely a style question — it is the primary obligation under every regulatory code that applies to UK journalism. The IPSO Editors' Code states that the press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading, or distorted information. The IMPRESS Standards Code requires publishers to take all reasonable steps to ensure accuracy. Your house style guide should translate these obligations into concrete newsroom practices.

Accuracy provisions to include in your guide

  • 1Define what constitutes a checkable fact and state that all checkable facts must be verified before publication against a primary source or an authoritative secondary source, documented in copy notes.
  • 2Specify how statistics must be attributed: the source, the date of the data, and the methodology where relevant. Percentages should always state the base number.
  • 3Distinguish between facts, allegations, and opinion in copy: allegations must be attributed clearly; opinion must be labelled as such.
  • 4State that numerical claims — polls, surveys, scientific findings — must include sample size and margin of error where available, and must not be overstated.
  • 5Address the treatment of pre-publication claims from subjects: state that their denial, correction, or comment must be included where it is material to the story.
  • 6Include a protocol for what happens when an error is discovered post-publication: the correction policy should be referenced here and set out fully in the corrections policy document.

Attribution conventions

Attribution is how readers assess the reliability of what they are reading. Poor attribution — vague sourcing, missing credentials, uncontextualised quotes — is one of the most common grounds for IPSO complaints and one of the most avoidable. Your style guide should define attribution rules precisely.

  • Establish when named sources are required and when anonymous sourcing is permitted. As a baseline, anonymous sourcing should only be used when information cannot be obtained on the record and is in the public interest.
  • Define how sources should be identified on first reference: full name, title, and organisation or relevant credential. Subsequent references may use surname only — the guide should say so.
  • Address wire copy and syndicated content: state whether reporters must independently verify claims in agency copy before publication under your byline.
  • Set rules for hyperlink attribution in digital copy: is a link sufficient attribution, or must the source be named in text as well?
  • Cover the attribution of social media posts: a screenshot or embed is not sufficient; the platform, the account name, the date of the post, and whether the account is verified must all be specified.
  • Address the use of AI-generated content: if AI tools are used in the production process, the guide should state when and how this must be disclosed.
  • State how to handle statements issued by press offices: note that a statement is from the organisation, not from a named individual, unless a named individual is quoted within it.

Inclusive language and accessibility

The NUJ Code of Conduct commits journalists to produce no material that “encourages discrimination on grounds of race, colour, creed, gender, sexual orientation, physical or mental disability, age, or marital status.” The IPSO Editors' Code prohibits discriminatory references to a person's race, colour, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, or disability unless they are genuinely relevant to the story. Your house style guide should operationalise these obligations — not as a list of banned words, but as a framework for thinking about when personal characteristics are relevant and how to refer to them accurately.

Disability

Use identity-first or person-first language in accordance with the preference of the person or community you are reporting on. Avoid medical-model framing that presents disability as a problem to be overcome unless that framing is explicitly the subject's own. Do not use disability as a metaphor ('blind to the facts', 'lame excuse').

Race and ethnicity

Use specific national or ethnic identifiers where possible rather than broad pan-ethnic terms. Check current preferred usage for any community before applying a collective term. Do not identify a person's ethnicity unless it is directly relevant to the story — the same test you would apply to any other personal characteristic.

Gender and sexuality

Use the name and pronouns a person uses for themselves. Singular 'they' is grammatically standard and should be used for people who use it. Do not disclose a person's sexual orientation or gender history unless it is clearly in the public interest and material to the story.

Religion

Identify a person's religion only when relevant. Avoid conflating religion with nationality or ethnicity. Do not use religious terms as pejorative shorthand. When reporting on intra-community disputes, seek voices from across the community rather than presenting one perspective as representative.

Accessibility provisions

The guide should address accessibility in digital output: alt text standards for images, caption requirements, avoidance of jargon and unexplained acronyms in body text, and the use of plain English summaries for complex technical or legal content. These are both legal obligations under the Equality Act 2010 for certain publishers and good editorial practice for all.

Photo treatment and caption conventions

Photographs are editorial content, not decoration, and the same accuracy and harm-avoidance obligations that apply to text apply to images. Your style guide should address the selection, editing, captioning, and licensing of photographs.

  • State that photographs must be correctly attributed in captions: photographer name, agency or source, and licence type (where relevant) should appear on every image.
  • Define the limits of permissible digital manipulation: cropping and colour correction are generally acceptable; manipulation that alters the factual content of an image is not and should be prohibited explicitly.
  • Address archive images: photographs used to illustrate a current story but taken at a different time must be captioned with the date the image was taken.
  • Set rules for the use of images of children: the IPSO Editors' Code prohibits interviewing or photographing children on subjects involving their own or another child's welfare without parental consent, unless the public interest justification is documented.
  • Define caption format: present tense or past tense, the inclusion of names and titles, and whether captions should end with a full stop.
  • Cover the use of social media images: permission requirements, attribution, and whether to use screenshots or platform embeds.
  • Address the use of AI-generated images: if your outlet uses them, the guide must state where, how they should be labelled, and what editorial oversight is required.

Headline conventions

Headlines are the most-read words in journalism and among the most regulated. An inaccurate or misleading headline is a breach of the IPSO Editors' Code even if the body of the story is accurate — a principle that has been upheld in multiple IPSO rulings. Your guide should define both the technical conventions and the accuracy standards that apply to headlines.

Technical conventions

  • State whether you use title case or sentence case in headlines — and apply it consistently across all platforms.
  • Define maximum character counts for web headlines (typically 60-70 characters for SEO) and print headlines (determined by column width and type size).
  • Specify whether headlines use the present tense for immediacy or the past tense for precision.
  • Address punctuation in headlines: colons to introduce attribution, single quotation marks for quotes, whether full stops are used.
  • Cover sub-headings and standfirsts: format, length, and whether they duplicate or extend the headline.

Accuracy and fairness

  • Headlines must be supportable by the story below them: a headline claiming something as fact that the story only alleges is an accuracy breach.
  • Attribution in headlines: if a claim in a headline comes from a specific source, that source should be indicated (— PM; study finds; report says).
  • Question headlines (‘Did X cause Y?’) must not be used to make an implicit assertion the story cannot support.
  • Click-bait formulations that misrepresent the story’s content must be prohibited explicitly, with examples of unacceptable patterns.
  • SEO considerations must not override accuracy: a headline optimised for search terms that misrepresents the story is both a regulatory risk and an editorial failure.

Maintaining and reviewing your guide

A style guide that is not reviewed becomes a liability. Language evolves, regulatory guidance is updated, and adjudications from IPSO and IMPRESS establish new precedents. Build a formal review cycle into the guide itself — at minimum annually, with a named owner responsible for each section. Use our Corrections Policy and Complaints Handling guides alongside this one to create a joined-up editorial standards framework.

Frequently asked questions

What is a house style guide and why do newsrooms need one?
A house style guide is a written document that defines how a newsroom applies language, punctuation, formatting, and editorial conventions consistently across all published output. Without one, different journalists will make different choices — some will write '10 per cent', others '10%'; some will capitalise 'Prime Minister', others will not. Over time these inconsistencies erode reader trust and create legal risk, particularly around accuracy and attribution. A style guide is the foundation of institutional credibility.
How long should a house style guide be?
There is no fixed length. A digital-only startup may need 20 pages covering the choices that arise most often online. A large broadcaster with print, broadcast, and digital output may need a document running to hundreds of entries. The key principle is that every rule in the guide should reflect a real editorial decision your team faces regularly. If a rule is never triggered, it adds length without value. Start small, audit what decisions your subs are making on the fly, and build from there.
Should the house style guide address social media content?
Yes. Social media is published output and is subject to the same accuracy and impartiality obligations under the IPSO Editors' Code and, for regulated broadcasters, Ofcom rules. The guide should address tone on social platforms, whether staff personal accounts require disclaimers, how to attribute and link to sources in posts, correction protocols for social media errors, and the use of headline formats that differ from print or web conventions.
How do we handle inclusive language without the guide becoming prescriptive?
Focus the inclusive language section on avoiding demonstrably harmful constructions rather than mandating every possible term. Cover areas where usage is settled and where errors create real harm — disability language, ethnic and racial identifiers, gender-neutral titles — and flag contested or rapidly evolving areas as guidance rather than rules. Link to the NUJ's guidance on reporting on marginalised groups and review the section at least annually, since accepted terminology changes over time.
Who should own and update the house style guide?
Ownership should sit with a named individual — typically the chief sub, head of standards, or managing editor — with a formal review schedule, usually annual. Updates triggered by significant regulatory changes (a new IPSO ruling, revised BBC Editorial Guidelines, an IMPRESS Standards adjudication) should be incorporated promptly rather than waiting for the annual cycle. The guide should have a version number and a published changelog so staff know which version is current.
What is the difference between house style and editorial policy?
House style governs language and presentation choices — spelling, capitalisation, punctuation, headline format, number usage. Editorial policy governs substantive decisions about what to publish, how to handle conflicts of interest, when to name victims, and how to report on sensitive topics such as suicide. In practice the two overlap and are often published together. The NUJ Code of Conduct and the IPSO Editors' Code both operate at the editorial policy level; house style is the day-to-day expression of those values in written form.