Skip to main content

PR & Comms Relations Pack

Five templates for UK journalists managing PR and comms relationships: pitch decline, embargoed briefing request, off-the-record agreement, press conference follow-up, and misleading-PR complaint.

Last reviewed: Next review due:

What’s in this pack

Five templates — copy, adapt, and send.

Declining a PR Pitch

A professional decline that preserves the relationship without creating obligations.

Embargoed Briefing Request

Confirms embargo terms clearly before you accept a pre-publication briefing.

Off-the-Record Agreement

Records the exact terms (off the record, background, deep background) before the conversation.

Post-Press-Conference Follow-Up

Structured follow-up questions with deadline and on-the-record confirmation.

Misleading PR Complaint

Formal challenge when a PR provides demonstrably inaccurate information.

Template 1: Declining a PR Pitch

Professional and clear. Choose the most relevant reason from the options provided.

DECLINING A PR PITCH

To: [PR NAME]
From: [YOUR NAME], [PUBLICATION]
Date: [DATE]
Re: Your pitch — [PITCH SUBJECT LINE]

Dear [PR NAME],

Thank you for sending this pitch through. I have reviewed it but I am not able to take it forward at this time.

[Choose the most relevant reason:]
— This story does not fit our current editorial focus or forward planning.
— We have recently covered this topic and cannot return to it in the near term.
— The angle you have proposed does not currently meet our threshold for coverage.
— We do not accept product-led or brand-led content of this kind without commercial agreements (which would be handled by our advertising team, not editorial).

I am happy to receive future pitches that fit our editorial remit. [OPTIONAL: The kinds of stories that work best for us are: [BRIEF DESCRIPTION].]

Many thanks,
[YOUR NAME]
[TITLE], [PUBLICATION]
[EMAIL]

Note: This decline does not constitute an embargo or any agreement about the content of any story we may independently pursue.

Template 2: Embargoed Briefing Request

Confirms the standard terms under which you accept an embargo. Send before accepting any embargoed material.

EMBARGOED BRIEFING REQUEST

To: [PR / COMMS CONTACT NAME]
From: [YOUR NAME], [PUBLICATION]
Date: [DATE]

Dear [NAME],

I am writing to request an embargoed briefing on [SUBJECT / REPORT / ANNOUNCEMENT] ahead of its publication on [DATE].

I understand the briefing would be subject to an embargo until [DATE AND TIME, e.g. 00:01 on [DATE]]. I confirm that I am willing to accept this embargo on the following standard terms:

1. The embargo applies to [PUBLICATION NAME] and my own publication activities only. I cannot bind other journalists or publications.
2. The embargo is lifted if: (a) the information enters the public domain before the embargo date through another route; (b) the embargo is formally lifted by you in writing; or (c) the embargo date/time passes.
3. I will not share embargoed material with any third party unless they also accept the embargo in writing.
4. The embargo does not restrict me from pursuing independently obtained information on the same subject.

Please confirm the briefing arrangements, including whether the briefing is on the record, on background, or off the record, and the format.

Yours sincerely,
[YOUR NAME]
[TITLE], [PUBLICATION]
[EMAIL] | [PHONE]

Template 3: Off-the-Record Agreement

Tick the agreed category before the conversation begins and retain as part of your notes file.

OFF-THE-RECORD AGREEMENT

Date: [DATE]
Journalist: [YOUR NAME], [PUBLICATION]
Source: [SOURCE NAME / DESCRIPTION — use descriptor if source is confidential]
Subject of conversation: [BRIEF DESCRIPTION]

This note records the terms agreed before the conversation took place.

TERMS AGREED
[ ] OFF THE RECORD — Information shared in this conversation will not be published, attributed, or directly used without explicit further permission from the source.

[ ] BACKGROUND ONLY — Information may be used to inform reporting but will not be attributed to the source by name, title, or in any way that could identify them.

[ ] DEEP BACKGROUND — Information informs the journalist's understanding only and will not be referenced in any form in published work.

[ ] ON THE RECORD — All information may be published and attributed as agreed.

ADDITIONAL TERMS
[Note any specific restrictions: e.g. certain topics excluded from off-the-record protection, specific documents that may or may not be referenced, etc.]

CONFIRMATION
Both parties confirm the terms above were agreed before the conversation began.

Journalist signature: _______________________ Date: ___________
Source signature (optional): _______________________ Date: ___________

This document is retained by the journalist and held securely as part of the editorial record. Source identity is not recorded where anonymity has been requested.

Template 4: Post-Press-Conference Follow-Up

Sends your remaining questions with a clear deadline and a note of what will happen if no response is received.

POST-PRESS-CONFERENCE FOLLOW-UP

To: [PR / COMMS CONTACT]
From: [YOUR NAME], [PUBLICATION]
Date: [DATE]
Re: [EVENT NAME] — [DATE OF EVENT]

Dear [NAME],

Thank you for the press conference / briefing on [DATE]. I am following up with some questions that I was unable to ask in the session, or that require more detail than was given in the room.

My questions are:

1. [QUESTION — be specific and factual]
2. [QUESTION]
3. [QUESTION]

I am working to a deadline of [DATE AND TIME]. If I do not receive a response by then, I will note in my story that [ORGANISATION NAME] was asked the above questions and did not respond in time for publication.

Please also confirm: (a) any statements made at today's event that were given on background only, if different from what was stated in the room; (b) whether any materials distributed today are embargoed, and if so until when.

Thank you,
[YOUR NAME]
[TITLE], [PUBLICATION]
[EMAIL] | [PHONE]

Template 5: Complaint About Misleading PR

A formal written complaint when a PR professional has provided demonstrably inaccurate or misleading information.

COMPLAINT ABOUT MISLEADING PR

To: [PR PROFESSIONAL'S NAME AND/OR HEAD OF AGENCY/COMMS TEAM]
From: [YOUR NAME], [PUBLICATION]
Date: [DATE]
Re: Misleading information provided in connection with [STORY / DATE]

Dear [NAME],

I am writing to raise a formal concern about information provided to me by [NAME / YOUR ORGANISATION] in connection with my reporting on [SUBJECT], published on [DATE] or under preparation.

Specifically, I was provided with the following information:
[STATE THE SPECIFIC CLAIM OR INFORMATION PROVIDED]

I have since established that this information appears to be [inaccurate / misleading / incomplete / contradicted by documentary evidence] for the following reasons:
[EXPLAIN WHAT YOU FOUND]

I am requesting:
1. A written correction or clarification within [5 WORKING DAYS].
2. Confirmation of how this information came to be provided to me.
3. Any supporting documents that substantiate the original claim.

If you do not respond or if your response does not address my concerns, I will note in my published reporting that the information was provided by [ORGANISATION] and has been queried, along with whatever response is received.

I am happy to discuss this by telephone. Please contact me at [PHONE / EMAIL].

Yours sincerely,
[YOUR NAME]
[TITLE], [PUBLICATION]

Primary sources

Frequently asked questions

Does the NUJ Code say anything about PR relationships?
Yes. NUJ Code of Conduct Clause 6 states that members must "differentiate between fact and opinion and not allow personal views to distort factual information." Clause 7 requires members to "protect the identity of sources who supply information in confidence." In practice, this means journalists must not allow PR access or freebies to compromise their editorial independence. The CIPR Code of Conduct also requires PR practitioners to operate transparently, which creates mutual obligations when embargoes and off-the-record arrangements are agreed.
Are embargo agreements legally binding?
An embargo is generally treated as a professional undertaking rather than a legally enforceable contract, unless there is a separate signed agreement incorporating it into a contract. Most UK news desks honour embargoes as a matter of professional practice to preserve relationships with sources. However, if a competitor breaks an embargo first, or the information enters the public domain via another route, the embargo is usually considered lifted. Always clarify in advance what happens if the embargo is broken by a third party.
What does "off the record" mean legally in the UK?
There is no statutory definition of "off the record" in UK law. It is a professional convention — an agreement between journalist and source that information shared will not be published, attributed, or used directly without further permission. The NUJ advises that the terms must be agreed explicitly before the conversation. If a source raises "off the record" after speaking, the journalist is not automatically bound. Journalists should be clear about what they agree to: off the record, background only, or deep background.
Can I publish if a PR sends me information after I decline a pitch?
Yes, in principle — information lawfully in your possession that is in the public interest can be published regardless of how it came to you, subject to standard editorial and legal checks (accuracy, defamation, privacy, source protection). Declining a pitch does not create an obligation to return information already sent. However, if the information was clearly sent in error or is marked confidential, seek legal advice before publishing.
What can I do if a PR complaint about a story turns out to be misleading itself?
Document everything. If a PR or comms professional sends you a formal correction request based on demonstrably false information, you can ignore it — but keep the record. If the misleading complaint is made to IPSO or IMPRESS on behalf of an organisation, both regulators allow you to provide a written response to the complaint. Persistent harassment by a PR professional in connection with lawful journalism may in extreme cases engage the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

Related packs

Related guides