Stocker v Stocker
[2019] UKSC 17 — Supreme Court, 2019
Last reviewed: Next review due:
What the court held
Meaning in defamation is determined by how the ordinary reasonable reader (or in this case, Facebook user) would understand the words in context. Modern social-media publications require judges to consider platform norms and reader habits.
Key rulings
- Meaning is judged by the impression on an ordinary reader in the specific medium.
- Facebook readers are hasty and impressionistic — trial judge erred by using a dictionary literal meaning.
- Social-media context is intrinsic to meaning assessment.
Topics
DefamationSocial mediameaning
Authoritative source
Read the full judgment on BAILII (British and Irish Legal Information Institute):
https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2019/17.htmlRelated landmark cases
Case summaries are drafted by UK JournoHub Editorial for practising UK journalists. They are not legal advice. Always consult primary sources and, for high-risk stories, take specialist legal advice.