Skip to main content

Stocker v Stocker

[2019] UKSC 17 Supreme Court, 2019

Last reviewed: Next review due:

What the court held

Meaning in defamation is determined by how the ordinary reasonable reader (or in this case, Facebook user) would understand the words in context. Modern social-media publications require judges to consider platform norms and reader habits.

Key rulings

  • Meaning is judged by the impression on an ordinary reader in the specific medium.
  • Facebook readers are hasty and impressionistic — trial judge erred by using a dictionary literal meaning.
  • Social-media context is intrinsic to meaning assessment.

Topics

DefamationSocial mediameaning

Authoritative source

Read the full judgment on BAILII (British and Irish Legal Information Institute):

https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2019/17.html

Related landmark cases

Case summaries are drafted by UK JournoHub Editorial for practising UK journalists. They are not legal advice. Always consult primary sources and, for high-risk stories, take specialist legal advice.