Skip to main content

Metropolitan International Schools Ltd v Designtechnica Corp

[2009] EWHC 1765 (QB) High Court (Queen's Bench), 2009

Last reviewed: Next review due:

What the court held

Eady J held that Google as a search-engine operator was not the publisher of snippets returned in search results, distinguishing it from primary publishers. Foundational for UK intermediary-liability law in defamation.

Key rulings

  • Search engine operators are not publishers of snippets they automatically generate.
  • Distinct treatment for pre-notification vs post-notification periods.
  • Established principles carried into Tamiz v Google and later cases.

Topics

DefamationIntermediary liabilitysearch-engines

Authoritative source

Read the full judgment on BAILII (British and Irish Legal Information Institute):

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2009/1765.html

Related landmark cases

Case summaries are drafted by UK JournoHub Editorial for practising UK journalists. They are not legal advice. Always consult primary sources and, for high-risk stories, take specialist legal advice.