Metropolitan International Schools Ltd v Designtechnica Corp
[2009] EWHC 1765 (QB) — High Court (Queen's Bench), 2009
Last reviewed: Next review due:
What the court held
Eady J held that Google as a search-engine operator was not the publisher of snippets returned in search results, distinguishing it from primary publishers. Foundational for UK intermediary-liability law in defamation.
Key rulings
- Search engine operators are not publishers of snippets they automatically generate.
- Distinct treatment for pre-notification vs post-notification periods.
- Established principles carried into Tamiz v Google and later cases.
Topics
DefamationIntermediary liabilitysearch-engines
Authoritative source
Read the full judgment on BAILII (British and Irish Legal Information Institute):
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2009/1765.htmlRelated landmark cases
Case summaries are drafted by UK JournoHub Editorial for practising UK journalists. They are not legal advice. Always consult primary sources and, for high-risk stories, take specialist legal advice.