Skip to main content

Chesterton Global Ltd v Nurmohamed

[2017] EWCA Civ 979 Court of Appeal, 2017

Last reviewed: Next review due:

What the court held

The Court of Appeal held that a whistleblower's disclosure can be "in the public interest" for ERA 1996 s.43B purposes even where the primary motivation is personal. The public-interest test is a low threshold and does not require the disclosure to actually be in the public interest — just that the worker reasonably believes it is.

Key rulings

  • Public-interest belief test in s.43B is subjective (reasonable belief) not objective.
  • Mixed motives (private benefit + public interest) can qualify.
  • Number of people affected is one factor but not decisive.

Topics

Whistleblowingera-1996public-interest

Acts cited

  • Employment Rights Act 1996
  • Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998

Authoritative source

Read the full judgment on BAILII (British and Irish Legal Information Institute):

https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2017/979.html

Related landmark cases

Case summaries are drafted by UK JournoHub Editorial for practising UK journalists. They are not legal advice. Always consult primary sources and, for high-risk stories, take specialist legal advice.