Chesterton Global Ltd v Nurmohamed
[2017] EWCA Civ 979 — Court of Appeal, 2017
Last reviewed: Next review due:
What the court held
The Court of Appeal held that a whistleblower's disclosure can be "in the public interest" for ERA 1996 s.43B purposes even where the primary motivation is personal. The public-interest test is a low threshold and does not require the disclosure to actually be in the public interest — just that the worker reasonably believes it is.
Key rulings
- Public-interest belief test in s.43B is subjective (reasonable belief) not objective.
- Mixed motives (private benefit + public interest) can qualify.
- Number of people affected is one factor but not decisive.
Topics
Whistleblowingera-1996public-interest
Acts cited
- Employment Rights Act 1996
- Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
Authoritative source
Read the full judgment on BAILII (British and Irish Legal Information Institute):
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2017/979.htmlRelated landmark cases
Case summaries are drafted by UK JournoHub Editorial for practising UK journalists. They are not legal advice. Always consult primary sources and, for high-risk stories, take specialist legal advice.