Last reviewed: Next review due:
What is the food and drink beat?
Food and drink journalism spans restaurant criticism, food safety enforcement, agricultural supply chains, food poverty and policy, drinks industry economics, and consumer protection. It is a broad beat that touches public health, economic inequality, planning, and regulatory accountability.
In the UK, the key regulatory bodies are the Food Standards Agency (FSA, England/Wales/NI) and Food Standards Scotland (FSS). Environmental Health Officers at local authorities enforce day-to-day food safety law. The Pubs Code Adjudicator regulates pub tenancy. The Trussell Trust and IFAN track food poverty. All are primary sources for different sub-beats within food and drink journalism.
Why this beat matters
- 1Food safety failures kill people: the Natasha Ednan-Laperouse allergen case led to landmark legislation, but enforcement is ongoing.
- 2Food poverty in the UK has grown significantly since 2010 — Trussell Trust foodbank use is a bellwether but not the whole story.
- 3The UK's pub sector has lost more than half its licensed premises since the 1970s — an economic and cultural loss story.
- 4Food fraud — mislabelling, adulteration, and supply chain deception — costs the UK economy billions and is chronically underreported.
- 5Restaurant criticism that lacks critical independence — through comped meals and PR relationships — misleads consumers and undermines the profession.
Core legal and ethical risks
Declaring comped meals
IPSO Clause 6 and the NUJ Code both require that journalists do not allow financial or commercial benefits to influence editorial output. A comped meal is a material benefit — the practice of critics eating free and not disclosing it misleads readers. Publications should have a clear policy on press meals. For online content, the ASA and CAP Code may also apply if the meal was provided with an expectation of positive coverage.
Fair comment in restaurant reviews
Restaurant reviews are protected by the fair comment / honest opinion defence in defamation law, provided the review: is comment (opinion) rather than assertion of fact; is based on facts that are true or substantially true; is on a matter of public interest; and does not contain malice. A review that falsely states facts — the food contained a foreign object when it did not, the kitchen failed an inspection that it passed — goes beyond fair comment and may be defamatory. Always ensure factual claims in reviews are verified.
Food safety allegations
Alleging that a specific food business has contaminated food, failed a hygiene inspection, or been prosecuted for food safety offences must be grounded in Food Standards Agency data, FSS data, EHO inspection records, or court records. The Food Hygiene Rating Scheme scores are publicly available. Do not rely on social media allegations or competitor complaints without verification. Always offer right of reply.
Drinks coverage and alcohol advertising rules
The ASA CAP Code and Broadcast Code contain specific rules on alcohol advertising: content must not appeal to under-18s, imply social success, or show irresponsible drinking. While editorial coverage is not advertising, journalists writing sponsored content for drinks brands must comply with advertising rules — and must clearly disclose commercial relationships with drinks brands in editorial copy.
Key data sources for food and drink reporters
Key organisations and contacts
FOI ideas for food and drink reporters
- Environmental Health Officer food safety inspection records in your council area — number of inspections, failures, and prosecutions in the past three years
- Local authority Trading Standards actions against food businesses for mislabelling, adulteration, or allergen failures
- Number of Planning applications to change use from A4 (pub) in your area — how many converted to residential and what community objections were made?
- Council procurement of catering contracts and food service — which suppliers are used in schools, care homes, and civic buildings?
- NHS spending on hospital food — cost per patient meal and any complaints received about food quality
- Local authority free school meal eligibility and take-up rates — are eligible children actually receiving meals?
Story ideas and angles
- Map Food Hygiene Rating data in your area: which chains and types of food business have the most one-star ratings and what are the most common failure points?
- Investigate foodbank use trends in your region: use Trussell Trust data and speak to foodbank volunteers about what has changed
- Profile a tied pub tenant's experience of the Pubs Code — are they better or worse off than before the Code was introduced?
- Examine allergen labelling compliance in your local food businesses: are PPDS products accurately labelled post-Natasha's Law?
- Cover a local food fraud investigation: check Trading Standards records for product mislabelling or adulteration cases
- Report on the school meals contract in your local authority: who provides it, what do they charge, and what are the nutritional outcomes?
- Investigate food poverty geography: map foodbank locations against deprivation indices in your area
Jargon glossary
Pitch angles
Food and drink pitches work when they combine data with human impact or expose accountability gaps.
- Investigation: “[Restaurant chain] scored 1 on the Food Hygiene Rating Scheme at six of its UK branches. We look at what inspectors found.”
- Human impact: “The foodbank in [area] is seeing families who have never needed it before. We speak to three — and map the data behind the surge.”
- Accountability: “Natasha's Law requires allergen labelling on all prepacked food. We visited ten local bakeries — only four were complying.”
- Policy: “The Pubs Code was supposed to give tied tenants a fair deal. We speak to three who say it has not.”